
RAMS generator — risk assessment and method statement
A risk assessment and method statement (RAMS), built to a real risk assessment template — hazards, controls and the safe sequence of works, from one conversation.
A conversation, then a checked RAMS
Describe the job in plain language and the desk asks back — one question at a time — until it has enough for a proper risk assessment and method statement: what the task is, where it's happening, who's doing it, and what's already known to be hazardous.
A RAMS only works if it's specific to the actual site and task — a generic template with the job name swapped in is the single commonest reason one gets turned away at the gate. What comes out of this conversation is a structured skeleton, not a finished, signed-off document: a competent person still checks it against the real site, adds anything only a site visit would catch, and signs it off before anyone works to it.
In order, the desk asks:
- What's the job, in a sentence?
- Where's it happening — site type, and is it live or occupied while you work?
- What trades or activities does it involve?
- Any hazards you already know about — height, hot works, hazardous substances, plant on site?
- Who's doing the work — your own team, subcontractors, or both?
- Do you already work to a house-style RAMS template, or starting from scratch?
What a risk assessment and method statement actually contains
The risk assessment
The method statement
PPE and permits
Emergency arrangements and sign-off
Who needs a RAMS, and when it's asked for
Anyone carrying out work with a hazard to manage needs one — a fit-out, a shopfit, an installation, planned maintenance — and it usually has to exist before work starts, not get written up afterwards. Under the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999, any employer with five or more staff has to record it in writing; on a construction site, CDM 2015 makes it the ordinary condition of getting through the gate.
A principal contractor or site manager asks a subcontractor for one before their team starts. A client or facilities manager asks a supplier for one before a live building gets worked on around its occupants. Either way, the person checking it is looking for the same thing: a document specific to this job, on this site — not a template with the address changed.
Where RAMS go wrong on site
A generic RAMS with the job name swapped in
No evidence anyone was briefed
The written method and the real one drift apart
Hazardous substances with no COSHH assessment attached
Outside what a free RAMS generator can do
Outside what a free generator can do
- Replace a competent person's review and sign-off — under the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999, a risk assessment only counts as 'suitable and sufficient' once someone who has actually seen the site or the task has checked it.
- Decide which CDM 2015 duties apply on a project, or stand in for a principal contractor's approval — that judgement sits with the people running the job.
- Carry out a COSHH assessment for a specific substance — that needs its own process, not a generated paragraph.
- Certify anything to a client, an auditor or a regulator — it produces a structured draft, never a compliance record.
Risk assessment and method statement questions, answered
What does the acronym RAMS actually stand for?
Is a risk assessment template the same thing as a full RAMS?
Who actually has to produce a RAMS?
What has to be in a good risk assessment and method statement template?
Why do RAMS get rejected at the site gate?
Can a generated RAMS be used on site straight away?
Does a RAMS need updating once work has started?
A structured RAMS skeleton — risk assessment and method statement together — as a PDF, ready for a competent person to check, add site-specific detail to, and sign off. Never a finished, approved-for-site document on its own.